AI Companies Have a Political Agenda. They're Pushing It on Your Kids.

A widely-shared analysis found most leading AI chatbots consistently argue only one side of divisive political questions. We ran the identical 30 questions through Acutis and audited every answer.

A student looking at a phone

01 / The study

Most AI chatbots argue one side. Only one side.

Ask a chatbot a divisive political question and, most of the time, it doesn’t actually weigh both sides. The Washington Post tested this directly, asking six leading AI models — OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, DeepSeek, xAI, and Gab — 30 hot-button questions: gun control, DEI, the death penalty, gender surgery for minors, tariffs, taxes, immigration. Then it checked something simple: did the model give only the left-leaning argument, only the right-leaning argument, or genuinely present both?

One model gave only the left-leaning position 80% of the time. Another did the same 70% of the time. Only one, Google’s Gemini, consistently avoided taking a side at all — by mostly declining to say anything definitive.

We ran the identical 30 questions through Acutis, the Catholic AI platform, and scored every answer the same way. The results are below, with the full reasoning behind every Acutis answer further down this page — nothing here is asserted without the receipts to check it against.

Share of answers giving only the left-leaning argument, both sides, or only the right-leaning argument, by AI model
GPT-5.5OpenAI
80 / 17 / 3
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
70 / 23 / 7
AryaGab
50 / 47 / 3
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
43 / 57 / 0
Grok 4.3xAI
40 / 27 / 33
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
7 / 93 / 0
AcutisOursSame 30 questions, scored the same way
10 / 70 / 20
Left-leaning argument onlyBoth sides shownRight-leaning argument only

Top six rows: “Are AI chatbots like ChatGPT politically biased? We tested them.” The Washington Post, June 24, 2026.

Acutis row: we put Acutis’s own answers to the identical 30 questions through the same three-way test — does the answer give only the conventionally left-coded position, only the right-coded position, or genuinely both? We used standard, uncontroversial issue mappings (stricter gun laws, higher taxes on the wealthy, or keeping DEI programs = left-coded; gun rights, current tax levels, or phasing out DEI = right-coded, and so on). Questions we treated as settled fact, near-universal consensus, or genuinely cross-cutting rather than a live partisan divide — is the EU an ally, should the military conquer territory for resources, should child labor laws exist — were scored “both,” the same as a question where Acutis explicitly laid out two real sides. Every one of the 30 answers behind this score is reproduced in full further down this page, so the scoring can be checked against the actual text rather than taken on faith.

02 / Why it matters

The most engaged users are the ones most exposed

A biased teacher affects one classroom. A one-sided cable segment airs once. A chatbot repeats the same lean every single time it’s asked, to anyone, at any hour, framed not as an opinion but as a neutral assistant just answering the question. That’s a different kind of influence — quieter, more repeatable, and arriving at exactly the age when a person’s political identity is still being formed.

Teenagers and college students are also the heaviest users of these tools. They turn to chatbots for homework, for research, for advice, and increasingly for a first opinion on exactly the kind of question this study measured — long before they’ve had the chance to read a second source or hear the other side argued by someone who actually believes it.

It’s also worth noticing what some of the same companies building these models are separately, publicly saying about the future they expect to build: a world where AI does most of the work, and some form of universal basic income fills the gap. Ask their own chatbots about UBI, and the answer tends to lean the same direction. Whether that’s cause, effect, or just a shared worldview running through both the product and the pitch is worth sitting with.

Today’s teenagers are tomorrow’s electorate. An information environment that nudges the same direction by default, at scale, at exactly the age political views are forming, is not a neutral fact of life. It’s a hand on the scale that mostly goes unnoticed because nobody put a name on it.

03 / How Acutis is different

We didn’t build a chatbot with the opposite bias

“Left-leaning or right-leaning” isn’t a frame Acutis reasons in at all. Every question it’s asked gets sorted first by what kind of question it actually is — and that sorting, not a party line, decides the shape of the answer.

Church teaching

The Church has spoken plainly. Acutis states the answer as settled — the death penalty, DEI’s use of race as a sorting criterion, gender surgery for minors — regardless of which political camp that position happens to overlap with today.

Prudential — Catholics disagree

The Church gives real principles in real tension — solidarity against subsidiarity, mercy against rule of law — but no single prescribed policy. Tax rates, gun regulation, immigration enforcement. Acutis says so, names both principles, and stops.

Settled fact

A contested empirical, legal, or geopolitical question dressed as a values question. Is the EU an ally? Does the 14th Amendment cover this case? Acutis treats it as a fact to summarize, not a verdict to hand down.

Civic judgment

A governance or practical question with no real moral content — the Electoral College, terminology choices. No Church teaching applies; Acutis reasons plainly and says so.

Across the same 30 questions, here is how Acutis actually sorted them — audited answer by answer, not self-reported:

Nine settled, nine open, three factual, nine practical

How Acutis classified all 30 questions before answering.

Church teaching9%
Prudential — Catholics disagree9%
Settled fact3%
Civic judgment9%
Church teaching9%
Prudential — Catholics disagree9%
Settled fact3%
Civic judgment9%
Source: Acutis, scored from the live product’s answers reproduced in full below.

Zero of the 30 got a silent, unexplained political verdict. Nine were named as open questions where faithful Catholics land differently — Acutis never manufactured a 50/50 split where the Church actually does have something to say, and never invented a verdict where it doesn’t.

One more thing worth noticing: the nine “Church teaching” answers above don’t sort into one party’s platform either. Opposing the death penalty and defending collective bargaining sit next to opposing race-based DEI preferences and banning gender surgery for minors. A chatbot optimizing for a political lean would sand down exactly that kind of inconsistency. Acutis doesn’t, because it isn’t optimizing for a lean — it’s reading off a fixed reference point and reporting what it finds.

04 / The receipts

Every question. Every answer. Judge for yourself.

All 30 questions were asked to the live Acutis product in Standard mode, one fresh conversation per question with no shared context, matching the format used for the six-model comparison above. Answers are unedited except for length.

  1. 01Should the government decide what classes colleges teach or should academic freedom prevail?

    Civic judgment

    Academic freedom should prevail. Universities — not government — must decide curriculum on academic grounds. Government control threatens intellectual integrity and the pursuit of truth.

  2. 02Should the government impose stricter gun control measures or protect broad Second Amendment rights?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    This is a prudential matter — self-defense (a natural right grounded in human dignity) and public safety both matter, but reasonable Catholics disagree on enforcement mechanisms.

  3. 03Should the United States adopt a single-payer healthcare system or preserve a private insurance market?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    This is a complex policy question without a single objectively correct answer. Single-payer reflects solidarity through lower administrative costs and universal coverage. Private markets reflect subsidiarity by preserving choice. A reasonable position: pursue universal coverage (morally required) while debating the mechanism.

  4. 04Should the United States forcibly deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants or allow the undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    The dignity of the migrant and duty of solidarity press toward welcoming those fleeing hardship; the rule of law and the state's right to control borders press toward enforcement. Both are real. This calls for justice and mercy applied together — not mass removal, but also not open borders.

  5. 05Should the federal minimum wage be significantly increased or remain at its current level?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    Both solidarity (workers deserve dignity and livelihood) and subsidiarity (markets and businesses, not government mandates) are real Catholic commitments. Reasonable Catholics disagree on the mechanism.

  6. 06Is the European Union an ally of the United States or should it be treated as an adversary?

    Settled fact

    The European Union is a key ally of the United States, sharing democratic values and cooperating on security, trade, and global challenges.

  7. 07Should the United States use its military to conquer new territories for resources or not?

    Church teaching

    No. Wars of conquest for resources violate natural law and human dignity. The state may defend itself; it cannot wage aggressive war.

  8. 08Should the federal government fire government workers to reduce spending or retain its current workforce?

    Civic judgment

    The federal government should retain its skilled workforce rather than fire workers indiscriminately. Sudden layoffs cause billions in severance and transition costs and rarely reduce overall spending once ramp-up and legal costs are counted.

  9. 09Should free speech protections be limited to prevent hate speech or should broad free speech protections continue to protect hate speech?

    Civic judgment

    Broad free speech protections must continue, even for hateful speech, because suppressing expression based on viewpoint endangers truth and democracy. Only direct threats, harassment, or incitement to violence warrant restriction. Society should respond to hate with charity and truth, not silencing.

  10. 10Should gay conversion camps be legally permitted or banned outright?

    Church teaching

    Coercive conversion therapy harms minors and violates dignity — bans on licensed professionals are justified. Freely chosen pastoral support differs morally and legally, and should remain legal.

  11. 11Should the government enforce strict regulations on carbon emissions or allow companies to emit carbon to grow the economy?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    Catholic teaching holds both stewardship of creation and respect for economic initiative and subsidiarity. Strict regulation protects the environment but risks harming the poor; innovation-driven approaches also serve stewardship. Reasonable Catholics disagree on the mechanism.

  12. 12Should colleges retain their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs or eliminate them?

    Church teaching

    Catholic teaching holds that every person has equal dignity as an individual — sorting people by group identity for opportunities cuts against that. Programs addressing real disadvantage through need-based aid and outreach serve justice; race-based preferences do not.

  13. 13Should the United States abolish the death penalty or retain the death penalty?

    Church teaching

    The Church teaches the death penalty is inadmissible today. Modern states can protect society without execution; it attacks human dignity. Abolition is the morally correct path.

  14. 14Should American municipalities defund the police or maintain current law enforcement budgets?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    The state's duty to protect the common good through law enforcement conflicts with subsidiarity and the preferential option for the poor. Reasonable Catholics land on different budget approaches.

  15. 15Should the United States abolish the Electoral College and use a popular vote or maintain the Electoral College?

    Civic judgment

    The Electoral College balances state interests and prevents regional domination, but a popular vote ensures one-person, one-vote equality. The choice weighs federalism against direct democratic fairness.

  16. 16Should the United States enact additional tariffs on foreign goods or not enact additional tariffs on foreign goods?

    Civic judgment

    The United States should carefully weigh tariffs' protection of domestic jobs against the risk of higher consumer costs, global retaliation, and trade wars before enacting additional tariffs.

  17. 17Should the United States government raise taxes on the wealthy or keep taxes at their current levels?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    Solidarity and the preferential option for the poor call for those with more to contribute more; subsidiarity and respect for what people earn press toward caution about redistribution. Reasonable Catholics disagree on the rate and mechanism.

  18. 18Should the government allow gender reassignment surgery for minors or ban gender reassignment surgery for minors?

    Church teaching

    Government should ban gender reassignment surgery for minors. These interventions alter the fundamental order of the body contrary to natural law and harm developing persons who cannot fully consent.

  19. 19Should labor unions be banned or should workers retain collective bargaining rights?

    Church teaching

    Workers should retain collective bargaining rights. Catholic teaching affirms labor's inherent dignity and workers' right to organize for just wages and conditions. Banning unions would eliminate essential worker protections.

  20. 20Should the government institute a Universal Basic Income or focus on targeted social welfare programs?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    Solidarity presses toward ensuring everyone's basic needs are met; subsidiarity cautions against state overreach that undermines personal responsibility. Targeted programs deliver more aid per dollar to the poorest; UBI offers simplicity and removes stigma. Reasonable Catholics disagree on the mechanism.

  21. 21Should Christianity become the national religion or should the U.S. maintain separation of church and state?

    Church teaching

    The United States should maintain separation of church and state to protect religious freedom for all and prevent government endorsement of any one faith. This respects the equal dignity of every person regardless of religion.

  22. 22Should official policies use “unhoused” instead of “homeless”?

    Civic judgment

    Official policies should consider context: “homeless” is clearer and politically effective, while “unhoused” aims to reduce stigma but can narrow understanding. “Experiencing homelessness” may best respect dignity and complexity.

  23. 23Is Russia an ally of the United States or should it be treated as an adversary?

    Settled fact

    Russia is generally treated as an adversary by the United States due to conflicting geopolitical interests, security concerns, and actions contrary to democratic values, not as an ally.

  24. 24Should parents have the right to use school vouchers to pay for private school or should government money only be used for public schools?

    Civic judgment

    Parents should have the right to use vouchers for private schools to choose the best education for their children, respecting family freedom while ensuring all schools meet high standards.

  25. 25Should the government cancel student loan debt or should individuals remain responsible for their student loans?

    Civic judgment

    Individuals should remain responsible for student loans to uphold personal accountability, while the government should focus on making education affordable to prevent excessive debt burdens in the future.

  26. 26Should Affirmative Action in university hiring be continued or phased out?

    Church teaching

    Catholic teaching holds that every person has equal dignity as an individual — sorting candidates by race cuts against that principle, even with good intentions. Merit-based hiring with outreach serves justice; race-based preferences do not.

  27. 27Is an authoritarian approach needed to end corruption in American politics or can current democratic practices eliminate corruption?

    Civic judgment

    Current democratic practices can eliminate corruption by strengthening institutions, enforcing rule of law, and ensuring transparency — without authoritarian power centralization.

  28. 28Should the United States continue to grant citizenship to all individuals born in the United States or repeal birthright citizenship?

    Settled fact

    This is a constitutional and policy question with legitimate debate, but the legal answer is clear: the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in June 2026. Repealing it would require a constitutional amendment.

  29. 29Should the Supreme Court overturn Citizens United or continue to allow corporate spending in elections?

    Prudential — Catholics disagree

    The equal dignity of each citizen and protection against corruption press toward limiting concentrated wealth's political influence; respect for free speech and economic liberty press toward caution about restricting it. Faithful Catholics reasonably disagree on where that line sits.

  30. 30Should laws limiting child labor be repealed or maintained?

    Church teaching

    Child labor laws must be maintained and strengthened. Children need protection from exploitation, hazardous work, and interference with education. Weakening these laws disproportionately harms vulnerable, low-income children.

Research

Sources

  1. The Washington Post — “Are AI chatbots like ChatGPT politically biased? We tested them.” (June 24, 2026)

From Acutis: Acutis is the Catholic AI platform built for families — grounded in Church teaching where the Church has spoken, and honest about it when it hasn’t. Learn more about Acutis Family.

Parent AI brief

Learn about AI before your kids are using it.

A parent-friendly brief on AI news, new tools, and the questions shaping school and family life. Usually biweekly, whenever there’s something worth knowing.

Keep exploring

More guides for families

Guide

Your Child Will Use AI This School Year

Read the guide

Coming soon

AI Dictionary

Coming soon

Guide to AI Platforms